LEADER 00000cam a2200709 a 4500 001 7595340 008 011211s1996 sw |||||||||||000 0|swe| 020 9170453241 041 swe 082 04 658.3125|223/swe 084 0 Qbfe 092 0 Qbf 245 10 Arbetsvärdering :|bteori, praktik, kritik /|credaktörer: Elisabet Cedersund, Christian Kullberg ; medförfattare: Clare Burton ... ; [illustrationer: Annika Elmquist] 264 1 Solna :|bArbetslivsinstitutet,|c1996 264 3 Halmstad :|bBull 300 181 s.|bill., tab.|c24 cm 500 |5Mo|aLÖV (Lönebildning och arbetsvärdering)-programmet 500 |5Mo|aSAMB 960-10 500 |5Mo|asvenska 520 Job evaluation allows different types of work to be compared, but some methods discriminate against work done by women. The authors describe the use of systematic job evaluation in the U.S., Canada and Sweden over the past decades. The four main parameters usually used to describe the demands of a job are knowledge and ability, effort, responsibility and working conditions. An evaluation can be more or less discriminatory, depending on how these are defined and combined. The cardinal sins are doubling and omission. Omission means that some important aspect of the work is not included in the description, which is often the case if it is a job usually done by women. Doubling means that the same aspect of a job is counted twice - as both decisionmaking and problem solving - a common practice in evaluations of men's jobs 650 4 Arbetsvärdering 650 7 Kompetens|2albt 650 7 Jämställdhet|2albt 650 7 Internationella förhållanden|2albt 650 7 Arbetsvärdering|2albt 650 7 Lönesystem|2albt 650 7 Yrkesskicklighet|2albt 650 7 Psykosociala aspekter|2albt 650 7 Arbetsorganisation|2albt 650 7 Equality between sexes|2albt 650 7 Men|2albt 650 7 Payment systems|2albt 650 7 Sex factors|2albt 650 7 Women|2albt 650 7 Working life|2albt 653 Personaladministration 653 00 Anställningsvillkor 653 00 Löner 653 00 Arbetsvärdering 655 4 |5Mo|aBok 700 1 Burton, Clare|4oth 700 1 Cedersund, Elisabet,|d1950-|4oth 700 1 Kullberg, Christian,|d1957-|4oth 700 1 Elmquist, Annika|4ill 710 2 Arbetslivsinstitutet|4oth 907 00 bl|ew|z960708
|