LEADER 00000cam 122006137a 4500 
001    18507686 
003    LIBRIS 
008    151009s2015    xxu      b    001 0 eng c 
020    9780415885478 
041    eng 
082 04 345.02501|223/swe 
084    Oeb|2kssb/8 (machine generated) 
092 0  345|bengelska 
100 1  Brown, Alexander,|d1974- 
245 10 Hate speech law :|ba philosophical examination /
       |cAlexander Brown 
264  1 New York, NY :|bRoutledge,|c2015 
300    xvi, 362 s. ;|c24 cm 
336    text|2rdacontent 
337    unmediated|2rdamedia 
338    volume|2rdacarrier 
490 1  Routledge studies in contemporary philosophy|v67 
504    Includes bibliographical references (pages 321-345) and 
       index 
505 0  Introduction -- Ten clusters of laws/regulations/codes 
       that constrain uses of hate speech -- Principles of basic 
       morality -- Principles of personal development -- 
       Principles of civic morality -- Principles of cultural 
       diversity -- Principles of political morality -- 
       Principles of balance -- Principia juris -- Toward a 
       theory of principled compromise -- Conclusion 
520    "Hate speech law can be found throughout the world. But it
       is also the subject of numerous principled arguments, both
       for and against. These principles invoke a host of morally
       relevant features (e.g., liberty, health, autonomy, 
       security, non-subordination, the absence of oppression, 
       human dignity, the discovery of truth, the acquisition of 
       knowledge, self-realization, human excellence, civic 
       dignity, cultural diversity and choice, recognition of 
       cultural identity, intercultural dialogue, participation 
       in democratic self-government, being subject only to 
       legitimate rule) and practical considerations (e.g., 
       efficacy, the least restrictive alternative, chilling 
       effects). The book develops and then critically examines 
       these various principled arguments. It also attempts to de
       -homogenize hate speech law into different clusters of 
       laws/regulations/codes that constrain uses of hate speech,
       so as to facilitate a more nuanced examination of the 
       principled arguments. Finally, it argues that it is 
       morally fitting for judicial and legislative judgments 
       about the overall warrant of hate speech law to reflect 
       principled compromise. Principled compromise is 
       characterized not merely by compromise over matters of 
       principled concern but also by compromise which is itself 
       governed by ideals of moral duty or civic virtue (e.g., 
       reciprocity, equality, and mutual respect)"--|cProvided by
       publisher 
599    Imported from: lx2.loc.gov:210/LCDB (Do not remove) 
650  0 Hate speech|xLaw and legislation 
650  0 Hate speech|xPhilosophy 
650  0 Hate crimes 
650  0 Law - Philosophy 
650  7 Hets mot folkgrupp|2sao 
650  7 Hatbrott|2sao 
650  7 Rättsfilosofi|2sao 
650  7 PHILOSOPHY / General.|2bisacsh 
650  7 PHILOSOPHY / Political.|2bisacsh 
650  7 POLITICAL SCIENCE / Censorship.|2bisacsh 
653    Dawit Isaak-biblioteket 
830  0 Routledge studies in contemporary philosophy ;|v67